Wk5: Lay Doubt.(2-1) vs FaQEyeReddit(3-1) (FAQ WINS)

https://i.ibb.co/FkLG2BqL/sfd.png

WK5

Punches due: Tuesday 16th September

Voting ends: Friday 19th September

You know the rules, if not, refer to the rule thread.

@Lay Doubt. @FaQEyeReddit

Yo yo

May be my last for a couple weeks

Before I go in on this Gay ass nerd,Let me send a Blade in first..
While acid get to the bare bones of it all I’ll- explain my words,
Just by having substance, I’ll turn a complex issue into nothing— in Lame-man’s terms..(lay man’s terms)

The shit goes down into flames anytime this clown’s spitting game
Dude’s approach w/ women is shockingly bad.. can’t even say hi to one without getting tased

Felt like a read a short story with reddits bar, lay doubt had a better line that wasn’t overly complicated.

Idk why people are explaining the wordplay within the bar lol smh

Vote lay doubt

tbh I know that Faq's bar has some text battle issues to it since it's more long bar but I felt his attempt at a punch via a nameplay was much better than the shockingly bad/tased concept. This battle could probably go either way with votes but I'm choosing Faq for this one (I'm a bit surprised myself).

v/Faq

Not exactly sure how to grade this. Fah Q had a cool bar, flowed well for the first bar, but got choppy at the end. The connections weren't bad, bare bones, substance, complex then a pretty easy nameplay. Not a bad bar

Lay came a little lazy, albeit if worded a little different and it prolly would have been a harder hit. You prolly came up with this fairly quickly.

Tough call but layman's terms is one I've seen a bunch, it was stretched and punchline didn't stick out enough

V/ LD

Lay had a good turn of a phrase but lacked some wordplay that would have upped this bar. Faq was had a lot going on but the irony of the bar being complex and the actual punch worked for me.
v/Faq

LMAO, bro what.

Yea I can’t even pretend to stomach this shit lol just close this and give dude the win.

Faq wins^^^